Psalm 82 and 89: God among the gods?

May 25, 2026

Why do some Psalms say such strange things? What do we do with the language of 'gods' or 'sons of gods' in the Bible? Some highlights from two recent Bible expositions I gave on Psalm 82 & 89.

I gave two talks the last two weeks on two rather odd and bizarre Psalms: Psalm 82 & Psalm 89. These two prayers say things like this:

God has taken his place in the divine council, in the midst of the gods he holds judgement (82:1)

You are gods, children of the Most High… but you will die like mortals (82:6-7)

Who among the sons of gods is like the LORD? (89:6)

A God feared in the council of the holy ones… (89:7)

There’s a lot of material that seems, frankly, a bit odd. If Judaism and Christianity are monotheistic, how on earth do we make sense of these kinds of psalms?

Do we just ignore them and pray the bits we do like (such as ‘singing of God’s steadfast love’ in 89:1)?

 

If these are part of what's often known as the 'prayerbook of the Bible', how on earth do we pray these particular prayers? Do they suggest that maybe we should shift to thinking about God as one god among many?! But isn't that heresy?


So what are we to do?!


***

The first thing to do is this: don’t panic!


There’s a lot of language in the Bible that’s strange and hard to understand. It’s not the Old Testament alone either—have you checked out Revelation 12 recently? Or any of the chapters past the letters to the churches?


What we need is a better lens. A better approach.


1.    Ancient Imagery is not Like Ours!

The Israelites were an ancient semitic people among various ancient semitic peoples. The Canaanites had ideas about the gods and their storm god Baal. Who fought various mythological foes like the Dragon (Lotan), the Sea (Yammu), and Death (Mot). The Babylonians had their own story called the Enuma Elish, that told of one god Marduk stepping up to the plate to defeat a vengeful Tiamat and her armies who were in opposition to the gods. He defeated her and fashioned creation from her corpse. At the end, the other gods enthroned him and lauded his name.


Israel was not immune from this language—and even found it useful! In some passages they use what's called the cosmic battle myth (i.e. a battle between G/god and chaos, e.g. Baal vs Dragon/Sea/Tiamat or Marduk vs Tiamat). They use that type of language to talk about God's victory in Creation (e.g. 89:9-11), as well as His victory in bringing his people out of slavery in Egypt (e.g. Ps 77:16-20).


What seems to be clear is this: Israel drew on this imagery but reinterpreted the other 'gods' (or ‘sons of gods’). Deuteronomy 32:7-8 and other passages talk about how God appointed these beings to be appointed powers over different people groups.[1] They weren’t God in the sense of a Creator God (Read though Isaiah 40-55 and this point is repeatedly made). No they were ‘gods’ in the sense of being some other kind of spiritual being.


God is still God. There’s still no one like him. He made the heavens and the earth (89:11). But there exists in the heavens other beings beyond God, angels and demons (and the Devil).


2.    So what do Psalm 82 and 89 do with the language?

Without going into it verse by verse, here’s what I am persuaded these two psalms are about:


Psalm 82 recognises that the ‘gods’ have some limited, delegated power. These heavenly beings have tasks given to them by God. But these heavenly beings are like subpar employees who are underperforming! Their job, as rulers over designated peoples and nations, was to execute justice and help those in need, but instead they had opted to lift up and exalt those who were taking advantage and trampling on the poor (vv.2-4). This is a big problem for the Psalmist: justice and righteousness is part of the fabric of creation. It’s part of who God is. In contrast, these other powers show their non-divinity by their unjust actions. So the Psalm concludes with a reiteration that these beings are actually created beings subject to death. And then the Psalmist cries out to God Most High for the justice and righting of wrongs he longs to see.


TL:DR? Psalm 82 exposes false gods as created spiritual beings and remembers that only God Most High is unfailingly good, true and just.


Psalm 89 goes in a slightly different direction. It begins with praise of God whose character is true. The Psalm uses God’s activity and status in the heavens (as well as his promises to David) as evidence of this. The language of the gods is used as a point of comparison: God is fearful to other heavenly beings themselves because He is God Most High. He made heaven and earth—Creation itself is testament to his unchanging, unwavering commitment and love. He is steadfast and faithful. (The unnerving thing here is that by the end of the Psalm, he’s using that praise and positivity to protest and lament to God that He seems to have abandoned the psalmist himself). The language of the gods (aka 'divine council' or 'heavenly beings') serves as a foil to declare that God is incomparable. None are like him. He's cut from a different cloth. There may be a vast array of heavenly powers, but none are God Most High.


TL:DR? Psalm 89 uses heavenly beings to exalt God as unique: he is unyieldingly steadfast and trustworthy (before the Psalmist later uses this to complain that his experience of life suggests something else and demands that God shows up and acts!).


3.    So what difference does it make?

A lot! Both psalms are written from a place of experience of or witness to suffering and wrongdoing. Unfair and immoral treatment of the vulnerable and those with no one to defend them.


  • It helps to remember that when evil seems to abound it is not simply a human affair. There are powers, there are heavenly beings, that do not act justly. Who do not care. As Ephesians 6:12 talks about—our battle is not against flesh and blood. It's not an excuse for fatalism, but it does give us grounds to recgonise there is more going on than meets the eye.


  • It also helps to remember that God is still God. The Bible bears witness to these powers, but also bears witness to the One who is God over all. God of all gods. There’s only so much we can do to change the world around us. It is God who will one day hold all such powers to account. And all human powers too.


  • It helps us see more of what God has done in Christ. Ephesians 2-3 talks about how Christ through the Cross has defeated all such powers and is bringing about a new creation. Jew and Gentile. People who were allied to various different powers, from different nations and places, are in Christ part of a new humanity. That is our primary identity as part of a new covenant with God Most High. We, as the body of Christ in all our diversity, are witnesses of what God has done in Christ to the powers themselves (Eph 3:10). The whole ‘old order’ is passing away. We are in Christ, our citizenship in God’s kingdom, and this far outweighs any political, national or other affiliation. (In fact, to put those identities first is to go back to being under lesser heavenly powers and forsake God Most High. And why would we do that?!)


In my talks in Wycliffe Chapel, I suggested that we might need to ‘rewild’ our cosmology—reimagine our view of God and the spiritual realm. The world around us is vast. Ecosystems thrive on biodiversity (and so does your gut biome!). What if the same is true of the heavens? Maybe it’s wilder than ever imagined. Which makes God all the more awesome in his incomparability.


******




[1] Full disclosure, there are various different takes on the 'gods'/'sons of gods' langauge in Deut 32:7-8 and elsewhere, but I'm persuaded that this language is mythological and that there is a clear sense of appointed heavenly powers.


Photo by Zoltan Tasi on Unsplash

By Suse McBay August 4, 2026
A friend asked me for my thoughts on forgiveness. Here's some of what I have come to learn.
By Suse McBay July 28, 2026
Let me start by asking a question: if someone came up to you and asked what's the benefit or blessing of being a Christian, what would you include in your answer? There's the things we might know to say from Sunday School: Jesus loves me, died for me, so I can be forgiven and free. Or something like that. Would it naturally come to your lips to say this: The gift of my faith is that no matter how hard life gets, no matter the sorrow or suffering that comes my way, I am reassured and strengthened by the confidence that God does not ignore the unjust lives or deaths of those who stick close to Him? *** This summer I’m taking some time to look at Daniel 11-12 and Book 4 of the Jewish poetic writings I research, the Sibylline Oracles . This post is an observation and an out-loud thought from some of my reading. Again and again, both in Daniel, the Sibyllines, an array of other Jewish literature, and the gospels (as well as elsewhere in the NT—e.g. Mark 8:38-9:1, 10:29-31, John 11:25, 1 Cor 15:16-19, 2 Corinthians 4), resurrection and the post-mortem life appears as an encouragement and response to the problem of human suffering. Not a rationale or justification. It’s not an answer to the question of ‘why does God allow suffering’ in any overt sense. But an end to the story of God’s peoples that shapes how the present might be lived. When I was very young, I thought resurrection was more-or-less a get of jail free card for the crucifixion. Jesus died on a cross to deal with sin and death. But if he isn't raised it's all pointless: so God has to raise him. Resurrection as an after thought, if you will. But resurrection isn't an epilogue. It's the victory. Without it the whole story is pointless. It's a real, substantial, material hope. *** Life is hard work. Life does not always go our way. Even when it does, that way isn't usually what we really wanted anyway! There's the normal hard stuff of life: work, family, friendships, health and so on. Then there's the hard stuff of following God. We are given so much goodness in the gospel: a relationship with God for starters! But also forgiveness, healing, reconciled relationships, a change and liberation of priorities, freedom and new life. All such wonderful and good things. Yet they are all a foretaste. Reconciliation doesn't always happen. We might have an interior freedom but experience hardship after hardship externally. I've been reading the diaries of Etty Hillesum who expereinced just that. She was a young Jewish woman in the 1940s. She experienced such a bliss and joy because of her faith and spirituality that found contentment even in life in a concentration camp. Yet her life ended at the tender age of 29. So much life left to live, so much potential unrealised. *** Resurrection is a reminder and encouragement that our real hope and the true fulfilment of the gospel isn't in the here and now (it begins now, but as a foretaste of what's to come). We aren't to expect ' everything will go my way ' in this life or that I should experience the perennial blessing of God in my earthly life and relationships. Following God will not be easy. The things He calls us to do may not succeed. The people we love may not love us back. The person we pray for may never come to faith. The change we want to see manifest in the world around us may not happen in this life. But resurrection says this: God has not forgotten. God sees it all. God will set right. Unjust deaths will be dealt with. Unfair hardship will be set straight. This life is not all there is. There is so much more to come, that all of this--even the heart-breaking stuff—will pale in significance in comparison. Yes, that doesn't stop it hurting in the present moment. It doesn't stop grief or stem the tide of darkness today. But it allows us to let go. Surrender. Trust. None of this has to be fixed now. We do what we can. But the outcome of it all is not one realised in this life, but the next. So take courage. There is more to come. ******

Join us in Oxford in 2025!

Subscribe to

My Newsletter

Sign up here to receive quarterly updates (and occasional other news blasts) about how ministry is going and our move to the U.K.