Why study Scripture? A case for academic study of the Bible

August 8, 2025

Why study academic theology? Here's a few observations from me.

******

I had a lovely lunch with my sister-in-law, Lola, the other day. In the course of all the various topics we were catching each other up on, I got talking about why I do what I do. Why is thoughtful, academic scholarship and study of the Bible important for Christians seeking to do God's will in the world? What's its value?


I didn't give an exhaustive answer to Lola. I'm not even going to attempt to do that now. But I think there are two pointers that are really helpful and are, at least, part of the answer.


(1) Academic study of the Bible is evidence-based. (We learn to see God (and his people) as He is depicted in Scripture, not as we want Him to be)

I've not been teaching at Wycliffe for very long. I've only just passed the 18month mark. But what I encounter quite frequently when people come to study the Bible for the first time, is how easy it is to read what we think the text says rather than what it actually says. It's really easy to do. So much so, we've all done it. I remember reading something a trained and locally-prestigious professional once said:


"The essential meaning of the Book of Jonah is individuation and becoming who you are."


Really?!


That's a stretch by any measure. Jonah is more about the propensity of God's people to draw boundaries which want to exclude repentent outsiders in comparison to a God who is far more generously-minded. The book concludes with very little resolve--it actually wraps up in chapter 4 with Jonah still angry (angry enough to die no less!) and God asking a question about his right to have mercy on a city full of people and animals. It's not about individuation.


We are prone to bring things into our reading of a biblical text that aren't there. Even good, honourable and perhpas noble things. Yes, there's more than one way to read a story as there is any text. But there are also readings that haven't really grappled with what the text actually says and seems to miss the point entirely (and perhaps invent an entirely novel one).


Take the Book of Amos. It has very little hope. It's a rougher ride than any other OT prophet. It's largely judgement and doom-and-gloom on the people of Israel. Does that mean I believe God is all doom-and-gloom? No! But I'm not going to read Amos and pretend that it is something it's not. The Book of Amos is important. It has a lot to say that, if we are wise, we will listen to. Instead, I'm going to learn from the book about God's demand for righteousness, justice and equity from his own people. I'm going to learn to take seriously how abhorrent God finds it when his people take advantage of their position and oppress, marginlise, and dehumanise others.


The academic study of Scripture engages with what is actually there. Academic journals, books and articles have arguments based in the text, in conversation with archaeology, sociology, and anthropology. Things that can be weighed, considered and evaluated by anyone (regardless of their faith). This is a good thing! The Bible is humanly written and divinely inspired. And God isn't afraid of humanity, penmanship or literary criticism. He is the God of all and saw fit to take on human flesh. Dealing with the "flesh" of biblical literature honours Him.


So we can ask what is actually in this passage? What does the story say? What does the psalm say? What do the gospels actually say?


Academic biblical studies trains people to think well [side note: remember that thing Jesus said about loving God with our heart and our mind? This is part of it!]. To read the text well. To set aside their preconceptions and see what's actually happening on the page. I could say a lot here about the value of learning Greek and Hebrew here, but I'll stop...


The long and short of it is this: it helps the Christian to read the Bible well. Not perfectly (we never escape our own situation and bias), but well. And my hope for every student is that they go away from class a bit more attuned to the details of the text and a little less atuned to their own interpretation of what they think it says.


***


(2) Reading differently = living differently. (Or simplistic answers = simplistic pastors)

Learning to look at the evidence, consider the reasoned arguments of others and evaluate them (hopefully charitably) leads to a better reading of the Bible. Which leads to a better understanding of how God has revealed Himself (not how we assume He has). But I also believe it makes us better listeners and readers of the world around us. Of pastoral situations. Of opportunities for outreach and mission. Of our own faith journeys and spiritual growth.


I read somewhere this year a piece of wisdom that has stuck with me. It was about doing things like laundry or washing-up. It said "how you do the mundane task is how you do every task." Or something like that. Probably a bit pithier. The point was about how we so often rush through the things we don't want to do bcause of an urgent sense we must maximise our time on the things we deem important [side note: I'm guilty of this one...]. But the logic is flawed. The truth is if we are faithful and diligent in the washing-up or laundry (or whatever other task we try and avoid), we are training ourselves in smaller ways to be faithful and diligent in the "urgent" stuff we want to spend our time on. We may not have as many minutes for those things, but we'll use the time we have far more wisely (not to mention, we won't be as rushed). We'll be better equipped for the work.


So how does laundry connect to academic biblical study? Well, learning to think well is learning to think well.


Learning to look at the evidence is learning to look at the evidence. Academic study of the Bible is an especially important place to do this. Why? Because it can make people better pastors. Because they'll think better. They'll engage better with evidence. They'll not assume they have the answers but be willing to wrestle with reality and reframe their perspective as needed.


Now, you might argue, if they have any academic degree, shouldn't that apply? What's so special at biblical studies? Great point. And, to some extent, I agree. But here's where people often get stuck. Academic biblical study brings together ones reasoning mind and personal faith into conversation. Someone can have the most wonderful education in another subject, but never have had to bring their faith into that conversation, so when they study the Bible for the first time, they struggle. [This is not true for all people. I am generalising a bit to make a point.] Academic study of Scripture is unusual in that it is a space in which people learn to think well in overt connection with things that affect and shape their faith.


When I first studied theology, as a fairly naive 19 year old, I found it hard to reconcile Abraham as a middle eastern nomad among middle eastern nomads with the Sunday School version of Abraham I had formed in my head. The Abraham I'd learned about at church was a borderline superhero. Now, I had top grades in my subjects at school. I knew how to think. Deal with evidence. But my faith had a lot growing to do. And it was in studying the Bible academically, that I began to wrestle these things out. I was confronted with something in my studies that, in turn, confronted my faith. It was a refining and growing experience. Learning to see the humanity in the text helped me see my own humanity better. It helped me see the world around me better. God's people aren't superheroes. They are painfully normal, broken and confused people. Dealing with the evidence of the text and history and then wrestling it out with my faith, helps me to be better at doing the same in the world around me. It helped make me a better pastor (and continues to do so).


***

Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not convinced that theology degrees are all that useful in the New Creation. God cares little about anyone's educational status or intellectual ability. Scholars in theological colleges and faculties are no better than anyone else, morally, spiritually or otherwise. Some study theology but never let it do the spiritual work I've suggested above.


But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Otherwise we could end up in a fantasy land where we create gods of our own imagination. We are minds as well as bodies and hearts. We are called to mental action as well as physical. To think well. And to be trained in our thinking. We each have gifts we have been given to use, appreciate and allow God to integrate within us. Why? So we can all grow into all that God has made us to be. We have gifts, including academic ones. So let's use them. Even if it's a little painful at times.


******

And a shameless, shameless plug here... If you're interested in stretching your mind in this way, here are some upcoming possibilities that Wycliffe Hall are providing:

 


******

By Suse McBay April 14, 2026
A few weeks ago, I got to sit down via the wonders of the internet and have a catch-up with my friend and former colleague, Wayne Watson. We talked God, life, and the universe. And Winnie the Pooh! In Wayne's own words " What begins as lighthearted conversation between old friends quickly unfolds into a thoughtful and wide-ranging exploration of culture and the pursuit of God's truth. " It was fun. If you fancy a listen, check out the podcast (and the entire series) by clicking here ! ******
deute
By Suse McBay April 8, 2026
***** I’ve long noticed that the Bible that gets preached from the Sunday pulpit can be, well, a bit picky. Some bits are kept in and preached. Others are studiously ignored. The result? Different churches can give quite a different sense of what the Bible's message is than if you actually read it through cover to cover. Now I don't mean to accuse any one wing of the church: whether your tradition uses the lectionary (usually a three-year cycle of curated readings) or jumps around the canon to whichever biblical book or theme is of interest, certain parts of the Scriptures are often ignored. Some passages are cut off halfway through; others are omitted entirely. I remember preaching on Independence Day in the US (the irony of doing so as a Brit was not lost on me). The reading for the day began in Deuteronomy 10:17: “For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe, who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the stranger, providing them food and clothing…” Sounds lovely, right? Well, yes—but Deuteronomy 10:17 starts in the middle of a paragraph. In the middle of divine instruction that God gives through Moses. We can see this in how it begins: for the LORD your God.. . It could also be translated because the LORD your God … This passage is the explanation for something. It is a why to a biblical command, not a standalone theological statement. So what’s the actual command? What’s the main message God wants the people to hear? The verse before (v.16) says this: “Circumcise, then, the foreskin of your heart, and do not be stubborn any longer.” The purpose of this speech? To call God’s people to repentance. To change. The ‘heart’ in biblical texts usually refers to one’s innermost self. The seat of who you are in the deepest places of your will and desire. God has said he wants their obedience (v.12), he has reminded them of his extraordinary generosity in choosing them as his people (vv.13–15), but here God lands a punch: The centremost part of who you are, God says, needs to be clipped. Reading vv.17–22 feels quite different in light of the whole text. It’s not a statement of a good God whom we should simply ‘fear’ and ‘hold fast to’ (v.20). It’s far more rooted and real than that. In reading through all ten verses, we get a sense of a people who have become too big for their boots. Who have forgotten that it’s not because they have anything to offer that God chose them, but rather because of the graciousness of God. And we get a clear call from God that such people need to, in essence, sort themselves out. Be humbled. Circumcise their hearts. I don’t believe the Sunday lectionary was formed with a conspiratorial agenda to omit the hard stuff (the whole thing would largely be read through in the daily lectionary for the Daily Office). But I do believe it’s spiritually dangerous for us to ignore the material that is left on the cutting room floor in our preaching. The people of God are called to grow into the fullness of the gospel—to become mature Christians. If we only ever swim in the protected waters of the lectionary, we will not be confronted by the reality of a God who regularly and reliably calls his people to humble themselves, care for those in need, and live lives of sacrificial love. Who makes space within their communities for the vulnerable. Who looks out for the marginalised among us. Who deals with the darkest and ugliest of human evil. Who redeems out of family lines and dynasties most of us would give up on. In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the importance of the gut–brain connection. How what you eat shapes who you are, and how you function mentally, emotionally, and physically. What we fuel ourselves with matters. The same is true spiritually. The Bible is the spiritual equivalent of a Whole30. Or a wholemeal, organic, seed-infused sourdough loaf. It’s nutritious and gritty. It requires some chewing. It’s not always easy to digest. But it provides the minerals and nutrients we need. It may take some adjustment, but it may also be just what the doctor ordered. Not for our physical sicknesses, but rather our more pernicious spiritual malaise. ******

Join us in Oxford in 2025!

Subscribe to

My Newsletter

Sign up here to receive quarterly updates (and occasional other news blasts) about how ministry is going and our move to the U.K.