New Musing: What's with the Chapters and Verses in the Bible?

June 26, 2023

The latest question I received: "Do the chapters and verses in the Bible help us understand the structure of the message of a given book?”

(Check out the Musings page of susemcbay.com is my Q&A page - a place for people to submit questions they may have about life, faith, the Bible and theology, and space to submit your own question!)


I recently had this question from a student working on an assignment I’d set (on Revelation). It’s a good one. We naturally open up our Bibles see the chapters and verses (and even the paragraph breaks) and think that’s where the author intended the break to be.

So what do we do when we open up a translation of Scripture? Or even the Greek and Hebrew which also divides by chapter and verse?


The first thing to know is this: the original texts did NOT have chapters and verses.


This came much later. I’ll be honest, I don’t know all that much about the specifics, other than that it was something that appeared from the 13th century onwards. Turns out with all the books Stephen and I have, I couldn’t find one that could give me some history on it.


Whatever the reason for their creation, they're ultimately just an interpretation. A way of understanding and making sense of the text but not by the original authors and the early church who recognized the spiritual authority of these texts and received them into the canon Side note: the “canon” are the books of the Bible that are recognized to have authority. Thus 1 Enoch is non-canonical for most Christians, except for the Ethiopian Orthodox]. 


The second thing to know is: paragraphs and subheadings can be misleading as well.


Take Ephesians 5:22, the famous “Wives, submit to your husbands” verse. It’s often put at the top of a new paragraph or even a new section of the letter to the Ephesians as though a new topic and line of thought is being introduced.


But it’s not that straightforward. The word “submit” isn’t even there in the Greek. It’s in the previous verse and it is dependent on that verse to understand what the message is. I.e. “submit to one another out of reverence for Christ (v.21), wives to your husbands… (v.22).”


So the paragraph should start at v.21, right?


Well, that’s also not straightforward! Because v.21 is dependent on the verses that come before it as well. [Side note: Ephesians is guilty of long Greek sentences that run on and on and this is a great example of that]. In grammatical terms the “submit” in v.21 is a participle (among a list of participles) that is dependent on v.18 “Do not get drunk on wine… but be filled with the Spirit”. Submitting to one another is one of the things that is part and parcel of a Spirit-filled life!


So what do we do? Do we all need to learn Greek and Hebrew? Go back to scrolls and original manuscripts?


Well, I’d never want to say don’t learn a biblical language. It’s great! If you feel a call to theological learning – go for it. That said, the main English translations of Scripture (NRSVue, NIV, ESV, NASB etc) were put together by many scholars who have studied these things and done their best (according to their conscience and theological learning and faith) and have had to make decisions along the way. I don’t agree with every decision in any of those translations, but that doesn’t stop me using them. Because (a) I’m learning too, (b) I’m grateful we have translations and less worried about them being perfect and (c) in this day and age I can always compare translations and see what they reveal. There may be a few places of disagreement but we have in common far more than that which separates us. Only God is the one who holds all truth in His hand--and he bears with us in our imperfections.


So Ephesians 5:21-22 is one of those points of disagreement, that doesn't have to stop us being grateful for the faithful work of those who have attempted the hard work of translating the Bible into a language we can all understand.




Have your own question? Submit it here here.


By Suse McBay April 14, 2026
A few weeks ago, I got to sit down via the wonders of the internet and have a catch-up with my friend and former colleague, Wayne Watson. We talked God, life, and the universe. And Winnie the Pooh! In Wayne's own words " What begins as lighthearted conversation between old friends quickly unfolds into a thoughtful and wide-ranging exploration of culture and the pursuit of God's truth. " It was fun. If you fancy a listen, check out the podcast (and the entire series) by clicking here ! ******
deute
By Suse McBay April 8, 2026
***** I’ve long noticed that the Bible that gets preached from the Sunday pulpit can be, well, a bit picky. Some bits are kept in and preached. Others are studiously ignored. The result? Different churches can give quite a different sense of what the Bible's message is than if you actually read it through cover to cover. Now I don't mean to accuse any one wing of the church: whether your tradition uses the lectionary (usually a three-year cycle of curated readings) or jumps around the canon to whichever biblical book or theme is of interest, certain parts of the Scriptures are often ignored. Some passages are cut off halfway through; others are omitted entirely. I remember preaching on Independence Day in the US (the irony of doing so as a Brit was not lost on me). The reading for the day began in Deuteronomy 10:17: “For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe, who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the stranger, providing them food and clothing…” Sounds lovely, right? Well, yes—but Deuteronomy 10:17 starts in the middle of a paragraph. In the middle of divine instruction that God gives through Moses. We can see this in how it begins: for the LORD your God.. . It could also be translated because the LORD your God … This passage is the explanation for something. It is a why to a biblical command, not a standalone theological statement. So what’s the actual command? What’s the main message God wants the people to hear? The verse before (v.16) says this: “Circumcise, then, the foreskin of your heart, and do not be stubborn any longer.” The purpose of this speech? To call God’s people to repentance. To change. The ‘heart’ in biblical texts usually refers to one’s innermost self. The seat of who you are in the deepest places of your will and desire. God has said he wants their obedience (v.12), he has reminded them of his extraordinary generosity in choosing them as his people (vv.13–15), but here God lands a punch: The centremost part of who you are, God says, needs to be clipped. Reading vv.17–22 feels quite different in light of the whole text. It’s not a statement of a good God whom we should simply ‘fear’ and ‘hold fast to’ (v.20). It’s far more rooted and real than that. In reading through all ten verses, we get a sense of a people who have become too big for their boots. Who have forgotten that it’s not because they have anything to offer that God chose them, but rather because of the graciousness of God. And we get a clear call from God that such people need to, in essence, sort themselves out. Be humbled. Circumcise their hearts. I don’t believe the Sunday lectionary was formed with a conspiratorial agenda to omit the hard stuff (the whole thing would largely be read through in the daily lectionary for the Daily Office). But I do believe it’s spiritually dangerous for us to ignore the material that is left on the cutting room floor in our preaching. The people of God are called to grow into the fullness of the gospel—to become mature Christians. If we only ever swim in the protected waters of the lectionary, we will not be confronted by the reality of a God who regularly and reliably calls his people to humble themselves, care for those in need, and live lives of sacrificial love. Who makes space within their communities for the vulnerable. Who looks out for the marginalised among us. Who deals with the darkest and ugliest of human evil. Who redeems out of family lines and dynasties most of us would give up on. In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the importance of the gut–brain connection. How what you eat shapes who you are, and how you function mentally, emotionally, and physically. What we fuel ourselves with matters. The same is true spiritually. The Bible is the spiritual equivalent of a Whole30. Or a wholemeal, organic, seed-infused sourdough loaf. It’s nutritious and gritty. It requires some chewing. It’s not always easy to digest. But it provides the minerals and nutrients we need. It may take some adjustment, but it may also be just what the doctor ordered. Not for our physical sicknesses, but rather our more pernicious spiritual malaise. ******

Join us in Oxford in 2025!

Subscribe to

My Newsletter

Sign up here to receive quarterly updates (and occasional other news blasts) about how ministry is going and our move to the U.K.