On Forgiveness & Matthew 18 (My First Sermon in Texas)

November 15, 2023

As our season in Houston comes to an end, here's the first sermon I ever gave at St. Martin's. It's from September 14th, 2014, looking at Matthew 18 and forgiving as we have been forgiven.


A few weeks ago I heard an interesting news story about generosity. At a drive-through Starbucks in Florida, a woman purchased a drink for herself but then also paid for a coffee for the person in the car behind her. One simple act of generosity. But it didn’t stop there. The gift was passed on. The person who received the free drink bought another free drink for the next person in line, and so it continued. Throughout the day a total of 378 people bought a drink for a total stranger through the initial thoughtful and generous act of one woman.

 

I wonder what acts of generosity you’ve known. I wonder if someone has bought you dinner, blessed you with a gift, maybe they loaned you a car at a time of need, or paid a bill for someone when they couldn’t cover it. I wonder whether you’ve known the humbling experience of being given something, a gift of time, money or service, which you couldn’t have done for yourself, or at least not without cost.

 

Peter’s question at the start of the reading from Matthew is really about the subject of generosity. “How often should I forgive?” How much is enough? How generous should I be? He asks. And, to be fair to him, he tries to be a good example. He offers the perfect number of seven as the model. You can almost hear the enthusiasm in his voice. "As many as seven times?" I wonder if he was hoping that he got it right for a change, trying not to get caught out by just saying two or three. Seven sounds good. Surely seven is enough?

 

But the question Peter asks, by its very nature, gets it wrong. He’s trying, but he doesn’t get it. As soon as he asks "How much?" he’s expecting a limit. A formula. It’s understandable. Give me a figure to work with, Jesus. I need something to go on, a formula to run with.

 

It’s a question we often ask.

 

But we know that Jesus doesn’t deal with formulas, he deals with people. And his response exposes the heart of Peter’s problem and leaves us with a challenging reality.

 

(1) Generosity in forgiveness knows no limits.


Jesus’ responds by saying not 7 times, but 77. In other words, Peter, it’s not about numbers. And then he tells a parable.


He tells the story of a servant who has an enormous debt cancelled. This servant had a debt of 10,000 talents. That’s roughly equivalent to all the income tax Herod the Great would have received from his whole empire for over ten years. That’s a pretty unthinkable number for the disciples to imagine. One rough equivalent in US dollars would put it at over 2 billion dollars.  It was no small sum. It was not just having your school loan paid off, or your mortgage covered. It was certainly more than having a coffee bought for you in Starbucks. It verges on the ridiculous – how could the servant have got into such an enormous amount of debt in the first place? But, nonetheless, the master foregoes his anger, and sets the man and his family free from any compulsion to pay. He gets to go completely free.


I don’t know about you, but I find this a difficult level of generosity hard to comprehend.

 

Jesus’ response puts Peter’s question in a bigger picture. This is not a numbers game. If you’re dealing with numbers, you’ve got caught up in the detail and missed the point. Look how generous God is towards us. If we truly have grasped this, then we will pass it on. If we don’t pass it on and harbor bitterness, have we truly grasped it? And that's an important question...


(2) Have we really come to terms with the extravagance of God’s cancelling of our sins?


It’s very easy to say with our lips that we are a forgiven people. We say words of confession and hear the absolution proclaimed to us. But do we know God’s forgiveness deep within our hearts? Do we know that whatever we have done, whatever the extent of how we have hurt, betrayed and overlooked the needs of others, we can be forgiven? 

 

Sometimes we don't want to face this level of generosity. We reduce God’s forgiveness to being somehow only because ‘on balance’ we do okay and it becomes contingent on whether we get it right next time. We might tell ourselves that in the grand picture of who we are, God doesn’t have to forgive too much.

 

Or we might only accept it in certain places in our hearts and only let it reach in so far. God can forgive this bit of me, but not the mess I try to hide.

 

Brennan Manning wrote a wonderful book called "Abba’s Child." In it he describes two selves – the imposter and the child. The imposter is the false self we build up. It’s the self that says the right thing, knows how to get what it wants, it knows what it should do to be accepted and does it. It’s the mini-Pharisee that sits within us all. Then there is the child. The real self that says what it thinks, feels freely, doesn’t always do what its told and is fully herself.

 

I think this is a good picture for thinking about how we reduce God’s forgiveness. We think he forgives the imposter alone. The Pharisee who’s broken a few rules, but generally does well. When in truth God wants to reach out to the child and show us his generous forgiveness and love, even in the face of the worst of our broken and sinful lives.

 

(3) If we get truly start to grasp the generosity God has shown us, it liberates us to pass it on.


As people who are forgiven we become people who forgive. I don’t know about you, but if I were the 299th person in that Starbucks line, I’d feel pretty obliged to be generous. I’d feel it was the right thing to do, and the social pressure of not wanting to break the chain would make me do it. It wouldn’t be from liberation but from compulsion and obligation. But with God, it’s all about liberation.

 

If we don’t get it we’re in danger of becoming like the servant in Jesus’ parable. Having been freed and sent on his way, what does he do? He goes and seizes a fellow-servant who owes him the equivalent of a few thousand dollars. He grabs him and demands the debt, and even when he’s asked for mercy, he refuses and throws the fellow-slave in prison. And as a result, the master summons this unforgiving slave back, revokes his forgiveness and hands him over to be tortured until he pays the debt. The message is clear enough.

 

Forgive us our sins as we forgive those who sin against us.

 

The problem is that forgiveness is still hard because people have hurt us. They let us down and betray us. We experience real resentment, real pain and real anger. So do we just shrug the hurt off and move on? Do we just say "I forgive you" and forget about it?


Flick a forgiveness switch and be done?


Obviously it’s not always that simple. The fact that Jesus says at the end of the Matthew 18 that forgiveness should come from the heart tells us that much. Forgiveness must be real. It’s not just an external, superficial excusing of bad behavior. Forgiveness honestly confronts the sin, but ultimately lets go of hostility and, where possible, moves towards reconciliation. Just as God has done with us. C.S. Lewis in an essay on forgiveness writes

 

Real forgiveness means looking steadily at the sin, the sin that is left over without any excuse, after all allowances have been made, and seeing it in all its horror, dirt, meanness, and malice, and nevertheless being [wholly] reconciled to the person who has done it.”

 

It doesn’t avoid the reality of the damage, but it doesn’t stop there. It acknowledges the fall-out of the sin, but then in time moves beyond it into a place of peace both in our own hearts as well as through reconciliation with the other person.

 

Sometimes we can do this quickly and easily, we just need to swallow our pride and confess our lack of generosity. Other times it takes a while and needs to be taken a day at a time. In order to either, but especially the second, we need the prayer and support of our friends and spiritual mentors. We need space to struggle to let go. Forgiveness is not like blowing out candles on a birthday cake. It's not taking one, big, deep breath and blowing out the candles all at once. It’s a marathon not a sprint. It’s an orientation of the heart not simply a one-time decision.

 

The parable Jesus tells reveals a stark contrast between the attitudes of the master and that of the servant. The master shows an extraordinary generosity and mercy to the servant in cancelling such a large debt, but we discover the servant does not do likewise. He is mean and ungrateful in his dealings with his fellow-servants. In a sense it stands as an ‘anti-parable’ – this shows us exactly who we don’t want to be like. But it also reminds us to refocus our eyes on the one who we do follow after, the God who has made our forgiveness possible through the ransoming of his Son as our payment. He has paid the debt.


The question for us then, is will we forgo our desire to keep score and limit our generosity? Do we, like Peter, ask how much is enough? Or will we follow Christ in the costly path of forgiveness and show generosity to others from the extravagant forgiveness we have been shown?


******




Photo by Jasmin Ne on Unsplash

By Suse McBay May 29, 2025
****** “A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.” I’m not sure if it’s true, but George Lucas, the creator of Star Wars, is credited as popularizing a big change in film production: not having opening credits. Instead of old Westerns and black and white films that began by naming the director, producer, key stars and so on, Lucas began the Star Wars films with the very famous line: “ A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away .” And then came the opening “crawl” that sets up the viewer for the story to come: "It is a period of civil war. Rebel spaceships, striking from a hidden base, have won their first victory against the evil Galactic Empire..." And so it sets up the story of Luke, Leia and Han Solo. Well, I want to suggest this morning that here in Acts 1 we have the opening words and “crawl” to the Book as a whole. And what sets the scene? Jesus’ ascension. *** In Acts 1, Luke recaps from where his gospel left off in Luke 24, with similar talk of the spread of gospel to the ends of the earth, that his disciples will be his witnesses, and his instruction to wait for the promise of God to come that is His Spirit, as well as, of course, Jesus’ ascent into heaven. But the Acts version has a specific focus: repeatedly mention the watching and looking of the disciples, the taking and lifting up of Jesus and the repeated mention of his destination: heaven. So why this attention in Acts' “opening crawl”? How does this set the scene for the story of the church that is told in Acts and continues today? Well, in contrast to the first victory in the opening of Star Wars, perhaps preparing for more victories to come, the Ascension grounds us in the defining, cosmic-shaping victory of Jesus that began with his resurrection and conlcudes with his exaltation in the spiritual world. Echoing Daniel 7, Jesus is taken up on a cloud, the chariot of the warrior-God, and is now enthroned to rule in heaven. The work of the church is done in light of this all-encompassing victory that has already been won. Christ is already King. But it’s not only that. Often we talk about Jesus’ ascension from a human perspective: his physical departure from earth. Here the disciples see for themselves Jesus’ exaltation and the opening of heaven: they are gripped by it. Through Christ’s entrance into and rule in heaven, he is made more readily available to us on earth. T he work of the church is done by living in a new space that recognises this opening of heaven: consider God’s promised Holy Spirit who comes in Acts 2, how angels appear here and throughout Acts, as well as people being healed, delivered from evil spirits, miracles taking place and people coming to faith . The spiritual realm is breaking in. So, this Thursday of 5th week, with deadlines, looming exams and soon-to-come ordinations: where will we look? Will we stare upwards and wonder where Jesus went? Or will we look outwards, and live in the light of the one who rules the heavens and has opened heaven to us, and for whom we wait to rule the earth as well? ******
By Suse McBay May 13, 2025
*** True Colours I was in a situation a few years ago where someone I trusted and expected to act in a certain way didn’t do so. In fact, they did they did the opposite. It hurt. It hurt because there were consequences that affected me, but it also hurt because I thought I knew the person, that I knew how’d they’d respond to pressure. When the rubber hits the road and things get real. Instead, their true colours emerged, and I was wrong. Who I thought this person was, and who they told me they were, was in reality quite different from who they actually proved themselves to be . The specifics aren’t for posting online, but I’m sure you can relate. Most of us can recall some kind of experience of someone we love, someone whose character we trust, letting us down. Someone who you might have believed in—maybe even defended to other people—choosing to do something that shows they weren’t worthy of that trust. Showing that your assessment of them was, essentially, quite different from the reality of who they are. They lacked integrity. Esther’s Example This term at Wycliffe, my colleague John is teaching his way through the book of Esther for the Bible expositions in chapel. Now the book of Esther famously doesn’t even mention God: so what is its purpose? Well, in part (as my colleague has been discussing), it’s a book about wisdom. Will we learn from the wise in the story: Esther (and Mordecai)? Will learn from the foolish: King Ahasuerus? The wicked: Haman? At the start of the book, Esther is a young, timid woman, who’d been through a lot. She was orphan and had been raised by her uncle. But she shows willingness and some social savviness and does what Mordecai tells her to do. By the end of the book she’s bold and courageous. Yes, she knows how to play the political game, but she does so in order to stand up for her people who are being persecuted by Persian imperial policy. She exposes Haman’s duplicitousness. Esther has a remarkable integrity and commitment to who she is and what she values. She is willing to risk her life to stand up for what is right, even knowing the cost. She has integrity. Her insides match her outsides as her character develops through the book. When We Fail Stephen and I go to a large Anglican church in the centre of Oxford. A couple of weeks ago, we had a visiting preacher (who is also a poet and philosopher) preaching about baptism. In the course of his sermon, he reminded us that who we really are is who we are when no-one is watching. And that Jesus died for us, knowing exactly what we do when the curtains are closed and no-one can see us. Again, it speaks to integrity—and that Jesus has come to deal with it. If everyone else thinks I’m a model Christian, but at home, by myself, I’m angry, compulsive, critical, selfish or greedy, the latter is a far more honest assessment of who I am and needs some spiritual help. It exposes a lack of integrity: I have an exterior self who looks one way, but an interior self (that I hide away) that looks quite another. What will happen when the pressure is on? That interior self will come out, one way or another. The good news is Jesus went to the Cross, even for that interior self. And with his help I can be forgiven, heal and become whole. That’s in part what baptism symbolises: me dying to all that ugliness and ungodliness. Naming it, owing it and leaving it with Jesus at the Cross, and then rising to a new life that where my insides match my outsides. A person of integrity. Learn from the Wise: Daniel 11-12 But what of the original situation: when others we trusted in and believed in have let us down? I’ve been teaching my way through the book of Daniel and its been fascinating to muse on this topic. Daniel 7-12 describe a series of visionary experiences that give God’s perspective on the political problems and extreme religious oppression that led to the Maccabean revolt in the 160s BC. These were largely due to the decisions of the Antiochus IV who was on the throne of the Hellenistic empire, a Greek of Seleucid descent. You can read about Antiochus IV in 1 and 2 Maccabees, but the snapshot version is that he installed puppet high priests in the Temple at Jerusalem, looted it for money to fuel his military campaigns, outlawed the Torah (including Sabbath observance and circumcision) and, most egregiously, desecrated the Temple with pig sacrifices and an altar to Zeus. These orders resulted in many faithful Jews having to try and keep Torah secretly. When discovered, those who had done so were public shamed and then executed (e.g. 2 Macc 6:10). It was miserable existence (2 Macc 6:9). Antiochus IV’s diabolical political rule was one thing, but the book of Daniel also wrestles with this: what do we do when our religious leaders let us down? When their outsides don’t match their insides? When we discover they are white-washed tombs (Matt 23:27)? The high priest and many other religious establishment figures were swayed by Antiochus IV at the expense of their loyalty to the Lord Most High. Daniel 11 and 12 in particular speak to this situation. Daniel 11:32 says that Antiochus will “seduce with intrigue those who violate the covenant” in contrast to “the people who are loyal to their God.” A few verses later we learn why: “Those who acknowledge him [Antiochus] he shall make more wealthy, and shall appoint them as rulers over many, and shall distribute the land for a price” (v.39). Antiochus used his power and means to get what he wanted, and those who showed more fidelity to him than to the God of Israel, got to share in that wealth themselves. So, what is Daniel’s answer to when the stewards of God’s covenant and teachers of God’s law reveal their true colours? When their words and who they’ve said they are don’t match up with who they have shown themselves to be? When those around us lack integrity, what are we to do? Well, it’s not to keep hanging on and believing in religious leaders who have proven themselves to be corrupted by political power (they are destined for shame and contempt, Dan 12:2). Daniel’s suggestion is to fix our eyes elsewhere instead: “ The wise among the people shall give understanding to many; for some days, however, they shall fall by sword and flame, and suffer captivity and plunder. ” (Daniel 11:33) Look to the wise. Look to those with understanding. Come to understand for yourselves. But this is not an easy answer. For these are the folk that get into trouble. Who perish by the sword. They don’t look like winners. This is perhaps why Daniel’s own response to the visions is one of weakness, fear and trembling. To understand and see reality for what it is can be deeply disturbing. In Daniel, understanding revolves around knowing God is God of all and all kings should have limits to their power. Even when kings like Antiochus IV trample on what is sacred, and transgress into the holy of holies—divine space—God through his angels is contending with powers beyond human ones and will bring all to judgement. But the waiting in the meantime will not be easy or pain-free. That’s why the promise of resurrection is so important in Daniel 12: it’s reassurance for the faithful—for the wise—to keep going. It is they who will be raised and will be like angels: "Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever." (Dan. 12:3) When those we’ve trusted and believed in fail us, God is at work. There may not be easy answers, and sitting with the reality of betrayal is painful, but God is not done yet. Sometimes what is happening is part of a much bigger, cosmic picture and God will intervene. Others’ words and actions may not line up, but ours can. Our insides can match our outsides and our words match our actions. With God’s help we too can become “ people who are loyal to their God ,” those who “ shall stand firm and take action. ” (Dan. 11:32) ****** Cover picture: John Everett Millais, Esther, 1863–65, Oil on canvas, 77.4 x 106 cm, Private Collection

Join us in Oxford in 2025!

Subscribe to

My Newsletter

Sign up here to receive quarterly updates (and occasional other news blasts) about how ministry is going and our move to the U.K.